Sustainable Results in Development

Description

Foreword Acknowledgements Abbreviations and acronyms Executive summary Overview: Using the SDGs as a shared framework for results SDG indicator adoption at global level: Opportunities and state of play Opportunities increase with the strengthening of the SDG indicator framework Partner countries are using the SDGs in their national strategies Increasingly, providers are also aligning their results frameworks to the SDGs Key issues Selecting SDG indicators at global and country level Managing different planning cycles at country level Measuring SDG indicators Mainstreaming leaving no one behind in SDG alignment and measurement Next phase (2019-20) References Notes 1 SDG 4.1.1: Education proficiency Introduction Recommendations SDG Indicator 4.1.1 – Global profile Global SDG measurement and reporting Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 4.1.1 Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers Alignment to SDG 4.1.1 in Ethiopia and Myanmar Country alignment to SDG 4.1.1 is still weak in both countries Development co-operation providers have yet to align their country results frameworks to SDG 4.1.1 Measurement and use of SDG 4.1.1 data in Ethiopia and Myanmar Measurement of learning outcomes in both countries has yet to be aligned with international standards In Ethiopia, country-specific measurement of learning outcomes is well established, but the coverage and use of the resulting data could be boosted Facilitated by well co-ordinated provider support, Myanmar’s current reforms aim to address gaps in availability and use of results data – and to align to the SDG indicator in the medium term Visualising the results chain for 4.1.1 in Ethiopia and Myanmar Conclusions References Annex 1.A. Country profiles for SDG 4: Education proficiency Indicator tables for SDG 4: Education proficiency Ethiopia Myanmar Notes 2 SDG 6.2.1: Sanitation and hygiene Introduction Recommendations SDG Indicator 6.2.1 – Global profile Global SDG measurement and reporting Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 6.2.1 Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers Alignment to SDG 6.2.1 in Kenya and Myanmar The national plans of Kenya and Myanmar are aligned to SDG 6.2.1a, targeting universal access to basic sanitation by 2030 In both Kenya and Myanmar, sanitation and hygiene policies and provision are fragmented, which creates challenges for SDG alignment Development partner indicators are still based on the MDG ladder definitions, and do not capture all the relevant elements included in the SDG indicator Measurement and use of sanitation data in Kenya and Myanmar Kenya would benefit from nationally integrated systems for collation and use of sanitation data Monitoring data for sanitation in Myanmar is in the early stages, but alignment to SDG 6.2.1 creates impetus for progress Both countries face challenges to ensure that data collection can capture the local context, while also meeting international reporting requirements Visualising the results chain for sanitation access in Kenya and Myanmar Conclusions and recommendations References Annex 2.A. Country profiles for SDG 6: Sanitation and hygiene Annex 2.B. Indicator tables for SDG 6: Sanitation and hygiene Kenya Myanmar Notes 3 SDG 7.1.1: Access to electricity Introduction Recommendations SDG Indicator 7.1.1 – Global profile Global SDG measurement and reporting Alignment of the corporate results frameworks of development co-operation providers to SDG 7.1.1 Country-level analysis: Alignment, measurement and use by partners and providers Alignment to SDG 7.1.1 in Ethiopia and Kenya At country level, alignment to SDG 7.1.1 through national and sector plans varies Development co-operation providers engaged in electricity access utilise a range of indicators Measurement and use of electricity access data in Ethiopia and Kenya In both countries, measurement of access to electricity is fragmented with use of both survey and administrative data Monitoring off-grid connections poses specific challenges The Multi-Tier Framework Survey, which provides more nuanced data on electricity access, has been administered in both Ethiopia and Kenya Measurement by providers tends to be project driven Data disaggregation needs further support Visualising the results chain for energy access in Ethiopia and Kenya: Data against most of the indicators are missing Conclusions References Annex 3.A. Country profiles for SDG 7: Access to electricity Indicator tables for SDG 7: Access to electricity Kenya Ethiopia Notes Annex A. Background and methodology for the project Background Purpose and objectives of the project Approach Case study topics Project methodology Outputs, milestones and timeframes Key outputs: References Notes