Peirce’s Account of Assertion
Book information
Description
C.S. Peirce held the view that to assert a proposition is to make onself responsible for its truth. This thesis interprets Peirce’s view of assertion and evaluates Peirce’s reasons for holding it. I begin by reconstructing and assessing Peirce’s case for such view as it appears in (EP 2.140, 1903), (EP 2.312-313, 1904), and (CP 5.546, 1908). Then, I continue by elaborating on three aspects of Peirce’s view of assertion,namely, assertion as an act involving a certain kind of responsibility, the proposition as what is asserted, and responsibility for truth as a responsibility to give reasons. With respect to these three aspects, I argue for the following claims: (1) Peirce construed the responsibility involved in asserting as a moral responsibility; (2) Peirce held that propositions are types; and (3) Peirce was committed to a dialogical interpretation of “responsibility to give reasons”. Finally, I end by presenting two objections to Peirce’s view of assertion and its corresponding replies. I conclude that Peirce’s account of assertion is a valuable contribution to the philosophical debate on assertion.
Similar books
The Sign System of Human Pretending
Antropónimos de mi amarga juventud
2013 · PDF
Conditionals, Paradox, and Probability: Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington
2021 · PDF
El surgimiento de la filosofía analítica Frege, Moore, Russell y Wittgenstein
2019 · PDF
Friedrich Waismann: The Open Texture Of Analytic Philosophy
2019 · PDF
What Philosophers Should Know About Truth
2019 · PDF
Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction
2018 · PDF
Tractatus logico-philosophicus
1963 · PDF