Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument of Criticisms
Book information
Description
The basic question of this monograph is: how should we go about judging arguments to be reasonable or unreasonable? Our concern will be with argument in a broad sense, with realistic arguments in natural language. The basic object will be to engage in a normative study of determining what factors, standards, or procedures should be adopted or appealed to in evaluating an argument as “good,” “not-so-good,” “open to criticism,” “fallacious,” and so forth. Hence our primary concern will be with the problems of how to criticize an argument, and when a criticism is reasonably justified.
Similar books
Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory (Argumentation Library, 11)
2006 · PDF
Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory
1996 · PDF
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
1998 · PDF
One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias
1999 · PDF
Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation
2021 · PDF
Historical Foundations of Informal Logic
1997 · PDF
Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation
2018 · PDF
Abductive Reasoning
2005 · PDF