Closing Arguments: Clarence Darrow on Religion, Law, and Society
Book information
Description
Clarence Darrow, son of a village undertaker and coffinmaker, rose to become one of America’s greatest attorneys—and surely its most famous. The Ohio native gained renown for his central role in momentous trials, including his 1924 defense of Leopold and Loeb and his defense of Darwinian principles in the 1925 Scopes “Monkey Trial.” Some have traced Darrow’s lifelong campaign against capital punishment to his boyhood terror at seeing a Civil War soldier buried—and no client of Darrow’s was ever executed, not even black men who were accused of murder for killing members of a white mob.Closing Arguments: Clarence Darrow on Religion, Law, and Society collects, for the first time, Darrow’s thoughts on his three main preoccupations, revealing a carefully conceived philosophy expressed with delightful pungency and clarity. His thoughts on social issues, especially on the dangers of religious fundamentalism, are uncannily prescient. A dry humor infuses his essays, and his reflections on himself and his philosophy reveal a quiet dignity at the core of a man better known for provoking Americans during an era of unprecedented tumult. From the wry “Is the Human Race Getting Anywhere?” to the scornful “Patriotism” and his elegiac summing up, “At Seventy-two,” Darrow’s writing still stimulates, pleases and challenges.A rebel who always sided intellectually and emotionally with the minority, Darrow remains a figure to contend with sixty-seven years after his death. “Inside every lawyer is the wreck of a poet,” Darrow once said. Closing Arguments demonstrates that, in his case, that statement is true.
Similar books
Clarence Darrow's Cross-Examination of William Jennings Bryan in Tennessee Vs. John Thomas Scopes
1988 · PDF
Are We Machines? Is Life Mechanical or is It something Else? A Debate Between Clarence Darrow and Will Durant
1928 · PDF
The Famous Examination of Bryan at the Scopes Evolution Trial
1929 · PDF
Should the 18th Amendment Be Repealed? Yes, Clarence Darrow; No, Clarence True Wilson
1931 · PDF
Infidels and Heretics an Agnostic's Anthology
2004 · PDF
Verdicts Out of Court
1989 · PDF
Ali je religija prenehala funkcionirati? Debata. Da: Clarence Darrow. Ne: Shirley Jackson Case
1921 · PDF
Silmä silmästä
1908 · PDF