Vicarious Kinks: S/M in the Socio-Legal Imaginary

Description

Who decides where "normal" stops and "perverse" begins? In Vicarious Kinks, Ummni Khan looks at the mass of claims that film, feminism, the human sciences, and law make about sadomasochism and its practitioners, and the way those claims become the basis for the legal regulation of sadomasochist pornography and practice. Khan's audacious proposal is that for film, feminism, law, and science, the constant focus on taboo sexuality is a form of "vicarious kink" itself. Rather than attempt to establish the "truth" about sadomasochism, Vicarious Kinks asks who decides that sadomasochism is perverse, examining how various fields present their claims to truth when it comes to sadomasochism. The first monograph by a new scholar working at the juncture of law and sexuality, Vicarious Kinks challenges the myth of law as an objective adjudicator of sexual truth. Dedication Contents Acknowledgments Prelude Introduction 1 Who’s Your Daddy? S/M’s Founding Fathers 2 Feminists Divided: The Battle over S/M in the Sex Wars 3 S/M in Showbiz 4 The Legal Fondling of S/M Pornography 5 The Legal Fondling of S/M Practice Conclusion: Epistemic Violence, Epistemic Pleasures Notes References Index