The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives Are No Substitute for Good Citizens
Book information
Description
Why do policies and business practices that ignore the moral and generous side of human nature often fail? Should the idea of economic man—the amoral and self-interested Homo economicus—determine how we expect people to respond to monetary rewards, punishments, and other incentives? Samuel Bowles answers with a resounding “no.” Policies that follow from this paradigm, he shows, may “crowd out” ethical and generous motives and thus backfire. But incentives per se are not really the culprit. Bowles shows that crowding out occurs when the message conveyed by fines and rewards is that self-interest is expected, that the employer thinks the workforce is lazy, or that the citizen cannot otherwise be trusted to contribute to the public good. Using historical and recent case studies as well as behavioral experiments, Bowles shows how well-designed incentives can crowd in the civic motives on which good governance depends.
Similar books
Wild Profusion: Biodiversity Conservation in an Indonesian Archipelago
2006 · PDF
Handbook of Niche Marketing: Principles and Practice
2005 · PDF
Disasters in the United States: Frequency, Costs, and Compensation
2017 · PDF
The Triumph of Evil
2000 · PDF
Trump University Wealth Building 101: Your First 90 Days on the Path to Prosperity
2007 · EPUB
Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History
2009 · PDF
The economy as an evolving complex system : the proceedings of the evolutionary paths of the global workshop, held September 1987, in Santa Fe, New Mexico
Funding Democratization
2007 · PDF