Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting
Book information
Description
This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language, and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion of another’s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man argumentation refers to the modification of a position by misquoting, misreporting or wrenching the original speaker’s statements from their context in order to attack them more easily or more effectively. Through 63 examples taken from different contexts (including political and forensic discourses and dialogs) and 20 legal cases, the book analyzes the explicit and implicit types of straw man, shows how to assess the correctness of a quote or a report, and illustrates the arguments that can be used for supporting an interpretation and defending against a distortion. The tools of argumentation theory, a discipline aimed at investigating the uses of arguments by combining insights from pragmatics, logic, and communication, are applied to provide an original account of interpretation and reporting, and to describe and illustrate tactics and procedures that can be used and implemented for practical purposes.. This book will appeal to scholars in the fields of political communication, communication in general, argumentation theory, rhetoric and pragmatics, as well as to people working in public speech, speech writing, and discourse analysis. Front Matter ....Pages i-xviii Using Quotations: Their Argumentative Uses and Their Manipulations (Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton)....Pages 1-33 Communicative Intentions and Commitments (Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton)....Pages 35-64 Establishing Commitments Between Ambiguity and Misquotation (Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton)....Pages 65-108 The Strategies of Misattribution of Commitments (Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton)....Pages 109-141 Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man (Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton)....Pages 143-186 Back Matter ....Pages 187-203
Similar books
Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation
2021 · PDF
Character Evidence: An Abductive Theory (Argumentation Library, 11)
2006 · PDF
Argument Structure: A Pragmatic Theory
1996 · PDF
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
1998 · PDF
One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias
1999 · PDF
Historical Foundations of Informal Logic
1997 · PDF
Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics: Theoretical Developments
2021 · PDF
Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation
2018 · PDF