Arguing About Science
Book information
Description
Arguing About Science is an outstanding, engaging introduction to the essential topics in philosophy of science, edited by two leading experts in the field. This exciting and innovative anthology contains a selection of classic and contemporary readings that examine a broad range of issues, from classic problems such as scientific reasoning; causation; and scientific realism, to more recent topics such as science and race; forensic science; and the scientific status of medicine. The editors bring together some of the most influential contributions of famous philosophers in the field, including John Stuart Mill and Karl Popper, as well as more recent extracts from philosophers and scientists such as Ian Hacking, Stephen Jay Gould, Bas van Fraassen, Nancy Cartwright, and John Worrall. The anthology is organised into nine clear sections: • science, non science and pseudo-science • race, gender and science • scientific reasoning • scientific explanation • laws and causation • science and medicine • probability and forensic science • risk, uncertainty and science policy • scientific realism and anti-realism. The articles chosen are clear, interesting, and free from unnecessary jargon. The editors provide lucid introductions to each section in which they provide an overview of the debate, as well as suggestions for further reading.
Similar books
Getting Science Wrong: Why the philosophy of science matters
2018 · PDF
Getting Science Wrong: Why the philosophy of science matters
2018 · EPUB
Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives
2009 · PDF
The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World
2006 · PDF
Realism and the Aim of Science: From the Postscript to The Logic of Scientific Discovery
1996 · PDF
Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge
2014 · PDF
Evolution of the Social Contract
2014 · PDF
Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology
2012 · PDF