Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning
Book information
Description
Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Neil MacCormick tackles these questions to provide a comparative analysis of legal reasoning. Institutional theory and the lawmaker's perspective -- The rule of law and the arguable character of law -- On the legal syllogism -- Defending deductivism -- Universals and particulars -- Judging by consequences -- Arguing about interpretation -- Using precedents -- Being reasonable -- Coherence, principles, and analogies -- Legal narratives -- Arguing defeasibly -- Judging mistakenly?
Similar books
H.L.A. Hart, Second Edition
2008 · PDF
Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems: Festschrift for Robert S. Summers
1994 · PDF
Argumentação Jurídica e Teoria do Direito
2006 · PDF
La razón práctica en el Derecho y la moral
2021 · PDF
Retorica E O Estado De Direito
2008 · PDF
An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism
1986 · PDF
Law as institutional fact
1973 · PDF
Razonamiento jurídico y teoría del derecho
2018 · PDF