The Ethics of Sports Technologies and Human Enhancement

Description

Cover Half Title Series Page Title Page Copyright Page Table of Contents Acknowledgements Series Preface Introduction Part I: Preventing Harm Chapter 1: Fost, Norman. ‘Banning Drugs in Sports: A Skeptical View.’ The Hastings Center Report 16, no. 4 (August 1986), 5–10. DOI:10.2307/3563105 Chapter 2: Murray, Thomas H. ‘The Coercive Power of Drugs in Sports.’ The Hastings Center Report 13, no. 4 (August 1983), 24–30 Chapter 3: Kayser, Bengt, Alexandre Mauron, and Andy Miah. ‘Current Anti-Doping Policy: A Critical Appraisal.’ BMC Medical Ethics 8, no. 1 (2007), 2. DOI:10.1186/1472-6939-8-2 Chapter 4: Holm, Søren. ‘Doping under Medical Control: Conceptually Possible but Impossible in the World of Professional Sports?’ Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1, no. 2 (August 2007), 135–145 Chapter 5: King, Nancy M. P., and Richard Robeson. ‘Athlete or Guinea Pig? Sports and Enhancement Research.’ Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1, no. 1 (January 2007). DOI: 10.2202/1941-6008.1006 Chapter 6: McNamee, Michael. ‘Ethical Considerations in Paralympic Sport: When Are Elective Treatments Allowable to Improve Sports Performance?’ PM & R: The Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 6, 8 Suppl. (August 2014), S66–75 Part II: Ensuring Fairness Chapter 7: Tamburrini, Claudio M. ‘What’s Wrong with Genetic Inequality? The Impact of Genetic Technology on Elite Sports and Society.’ Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1, no. 2 (August 2007), 229–238 Chapter 8: Murray, Thomas H. ‘Making Sense of Fairness in Sports.’ Hastings Center Report 40, no. 2 (2010), 13–15 Chapter 9: Carr, Craig L. ‘Fairness and Performance Enhancement in Sport.’ Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35, no. 2 (October 2008), 193–207 Chapter 10: Edwards, S. D. ‘Should Oscar Pistorius Be Excluded from the 2008 Olympic Games?’ Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (August 2008), 112–125 Chapter 11: Van Hilvoorde, Ivo, Rein Vos, and Guido de Wert. ‘Flopping, Klapping and Gene Doping: Dichotomies between ‘Natural’ and ‘Artificial’ in Elite Sport.’ Social Studies of Science 37, no. 2 (April 2007), 173–200 Part III: Preserving the Spirit of Sport Chapter 12: Loland, Sigmund, and Hans Hoppeler. ‘Justifying Anti-Doping: The Fair Opportunity Principle and the Biology of Performance Enhancement.’ European Journal of Sport Science 12, no. 4 (July 2012), 347–353 Chapter 13: Loland, Sigmund. ‘Technology in Sport: Three Ideal-Typical Views and Their Implications.’ European Journal of Sport Science 2, no. 1 (February 2002), 1–11 Chapter 14: Juengst, Eric. ‘Annotating the Moral Map of Enhancement: Gene Doping, the Limits of Medicine, and the Spirit of Sport.’ In: Tom Murray, (ed.), Performance-Enhancing Technologies in Sports: Ethical, Conceptual, and Scientific Issues (Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 2009), 175–204 Chapter 15: Bonte Pieter, Sigrid Sterckx, and Guido Pennings. ‘May the Blessed Man Win: A Critique of the Categorical Preference for Natural Talent Over Doping as Proper Origins of Athletic Ability.’ Journal of Medical Philosophy 39 no. 4 (August 2014), 368–386 Chapter 16: Hoberman, John. ‘Listening to Steroids.’ The Wilson Quarterly 19, no. 1 (Winter 1995), 35–44 Chapter 17: Miah, Andy. ‘Rethinking Enhancement in Sport.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1093, no. 1 (December 2006), 301–320 Chapter 18: McNamee, Michael J. ‘The Spirit of Sport and the Medicalisation of Anti-Doping: Empirical and Normative Ethics.’ Asian Bioethics Review 4, no. 4 (2012), 374–392 Part IV: Sport and Human Enhancement Chapter 19: Mehlman, Maxwell J. ‘Cognition-Enhancing Drugs.’ The Milbank Quarterly 82, no. 3 (2004), 483–506 Chapter 20: Lamkin, Matt. ‘Cognitive Enhancements and the Values of Higher Education.’ Health Care Analysis 20 (2012), 347–355 Chapter 21: Savulescu, Julian. ‘Justice, Fairness, and Enhancement.’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1093, no. 1 (December 2006), 321–338. DOI:10.1196/annals.1382.021 Part V: Enhancement beyond Sport Chapter 22: Sandel, Michael. ‘The Case against Perfection.’ The Atlantic Monthly 293, no. 3 (2004), 51–62 Chapter 23: Bostrom, Nick. ‘Human Genetic Enhancements: A Transhumanist Perspective.’ The Journal of Value Inquiry 37, no. 4 (2003), 493–506 Chapter 24: Buchanan, Allen. ‘Enhancement and the Ethics of Development.’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18, no. 1 (March 2008), 1–34 Chapter 25: Sparrow, Robert. ‘A Not-So-New Eugenics: Harris and Savulescu on Human Enhancement.’ Hastings Center Report 41, no. 1 (2011), 32–42 Chapter 26: Harris, John. ‘Moral Enhancement and Freedom.’ Bioethics 25, no. 2 (2011), 102–111 Chapter 27: Overall, Christine. ‘Life Enhancement Technologies: The Significance of Social Category Membership.’ In: Julian Savulescu and Nick Bostrom (eds), Human Enhancement. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 327–340 Chapter 28: Landeweerd, Lauren. ‘Asperger’s Syndrome, Bipolar Disorder and the Relation between Mood, Cognition, and Well-Being.’ In: J. Savulescu, R. ter Meulen and G. Kahane (eds), Enhancing Human Capacities (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2011), 207–217 Chapter 29: Daniels, Norman. ‘Normal Functioning and the Treatment-Enhancement Distinction.’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9, no. 3 (2000), 309–322 Chapter 30: Outram, Simon M., and Eric Racine. ‘Developing Public Health Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement: An Analysis of Current Reports.’ Public Health Ethics 4, no. 1 (April 2011), 93–105. DOI:10.1093/phe/phr006 Index