ENGLISH

Proportionality and Judicial Activism: Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa

By Niels Petersen

Book information

Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Year
2017
ISBN
1107177987, 9781107177987
Language
english
Format
PDF
Filesize
2 MB (2263484 bytes)
Pages
x+250\254
Topic
Jurisprudence Law
Time added
2018-03-29 11:30:46
Civil Rights;Constitutional Law;Law;General;ConstiUsed & Rental Textbooks;Specialty Boutique

Description

The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism.

Similar books