The Duty of Medical Practitioners and CAM/TCM Practitioners to Inform Competent Adult Patients about Alternatives
Book information
Description
The book pays interest to a small and almost untouched topic: a health practitioner’ s duty to inform about alternatives. It covers both orthodox medicine practitioners and CAM practitioners. The topic is explored in a co mparative way, examining the laws of not only common law jurisdictions, such as the USA, England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, but also two East Asia jurisdictions ( China and Japan ) . It uses the collective wisdom of several common law jurisdictions, but also differentiates them. It places the issue of “disclosure of alternatives” in a clear and wider context, making a cogent distinction between diagnosis/treatment and information disclosure.
Similar books
The mHealth Power Paradox Improving Data Protection in Health Apps through Self-Regulation in the European Union (in: Innovation and Protection: The Future of Medical Device Regulation, eds. I. Glenn Cohen; Timo Minssen; W. Nicholson Price II; Christopher T. Robertson; Carmel Shachar)
2022 · PDF
EU regulation of artificial intelligence: Challenges for patients’ rights
2022 · PDF
A Theory Of Bioethics
2021 · PDF
Big Data, Health Law, and Bioethics
2018 · PDF
Gesundheit und Gerechtigkeit: Ein interkultureller Vergleich zwischen Österreich und den Philippinen
2010 · PDF
Kindermedizin — Werte versus Ökonomie: 1. Jahrestagung Politische Kindermedizin 2007
2008 · PDF
Medizinrecht: Arztrecht, Arzneimittelrecht, Medizinprodukterecht und Transfusionsrecht
2008 · PDF
Kommentar zum Medizinproduktegesetz (MPG)
2010 · PDF