Philosophy, Bullshit, and Peer Review
Book information
Description
Peer review is supposed to ensure that published work, in philosophy and in other disciplines, meets high standards of rigor and interest. But many people fear that it no longer is fit to play this role. This Element examines some of their concerns. It uses evidence that critics of peer review sometimes cite to show its failures, as well as empirical literature on the reception of bullshit, to advance positive claims about how the assessment of scholarly work is appropriately influenced by features of the context in which it appears: for example, by readers' knowledge of authorship or of publication venue. Reader attitude makes an appropriate and sometimes decisive difference to perceptions of argument quality. This Element finishes by considering the difference that author attitudes to their own arguments can appropriately make to their reception. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Similar books
Evolutionary Ethics: Volume III
2010 · PDF
Self-Control
2022 · PDF
Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People
2022 · PDF
What Makes Us Moral?: Crossing the Boundaries of Biology
2004 · PDF
Consciousness and Moral Responsibility
2014 · PDF
Addiction and Self-Control: Perspectives from Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience
2013 · PDF
Hard Luck: How Luck Undermines Free Will and Moral Responsibility
2011 · PDF
Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century
2007 · PDF