Judicial reasoning under UK
Book information
Description
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading experts in the field, which examines judicial decision-making under the UK's de facto Bill of Rights. The book focuses both on changes in areas of substantive law and the techniques of judicial reasoning adopted to implement the Act. The contributors therefore consider first general Convention and Human Rights Act concepts - statutory interpretation, horizontal effect, judicial review, deference, the reception of Strasbourg case-law - since they arise across all areas of substantive law. They then proceed to examine not only the use of such concepts in particular fields of law (privacy, family law, clashing rights, discrimination and criminal procedure), but also the modes of reasoning by which judges seek to bridge the divide between familiar common law and statutory doctrines and those in the Convention.
Similar books
Q&A Constitutional & Administrative Law 2009-2010 (Questions and Answers)
2009 · PDF
Developments in Counter-Terrorist Measures and Uses of Technology
2013 · EPUB
The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Constitutional Law
2019 · PDF
Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law
2013 · PDF
Civil Liberties & Human Rights
2007 · PDF
Civil Liberties & Human Rights
2007 · PDF
Q&A Civil Liberties & Human Rights 2007 2008 (Questions and Answers)
2008 · PDF
The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom
2011 · PDF