The Question of Intervention: John Stuart Mill and the Responsibility to Protect

Description

The question of when or if a nation should intervene in another country’s affairs is one of the most important concerns in today’s volatile world. Taking John Stuart Mill’s famous 1859 essay “A Few Words on Non-Intervention” as his starting point, international relations scholar Michael W. Doyle addresses the thorny issue of when a state’s sovereignty should be respected and when it should be overridden or disregarded by other states in the name of humanitarian protection, national self-determination, or national security. In this time of complex social and political interplay and increasingly sophisticated and deadly weaponry, Doyle reinvigorates Mill’s principles for a new era while assessing the new United Nations doctrine of responsibility to protect.   In the twenty-first century, intervention can take many forms: military and economic, unilateral and multilateral. Doyle’s thought-provoking argument examines essential moral and legal questions underlying significant American foreign policy dilemmas of recent years, including Libya, Iraq, and Afghanistan. CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1. Nonintervention 2. Exceptions That Override 3. Exceptions That Disregard 4. Libya, the “Responsibility to Protect,” and the New Moral Minimum 5. Postbellum Peacebuilding Conclusion APPENDIX 1: John Stuart Mill’s “A Few Words on Non-Intervention” APPENDIX 2. List of Interventions 1815–2003 Michael Doyle and Camille Strauss-Kahn INDEX