Evicitionism: The compromise solution to the pro-life pro-choice debate controversy

Description

This book applies libertarian property rights theory to a vexing controversy, abortion. This book offers a compromise solution that will not fully please either of the two sides of this debate, but, is the only possible reconciliation between the two. Nor are its benefits limited to the fact that the opposing forces in this debate may be brought together. Evictionism, also, is the only philosophical position compatible with human rights; neither of the other two can make this claim. There are many other publications and learned articles supporting the pro-life position as well as defending the pro-life viewpoint. This is the only book that offers a perspective on abortion that is radically different than both. This book uniquely applies private property rights theories we all agree upon when referred to issues such as real estate, crime, torts, etc., to abortion. The underlying philosophical contribution of Evictionism this book presents is that these basic legal premises can be utilized in this controversial case as well as practically everywhere else in law. Want to solve the abortion controversy? Want to demonstrate that both the pro-life and the pro-choice positions are erroneous? Want to read about a position that is a compromise between the pro-life and the pro-choice positions? Then this book provides robust understanding, discussions and applications for getting to the truth about this issue.  Acknowledgements Contents Part I: Introduction Chapter 1: Introduction References Part II: What Is Evictionism? The Background Chapter 2: What Is Evictionism? Part III: Response to Libertarian Critics of Evictionism Chapter 3: Responses to Three Leading Libertarians: Rothbard, Paul and Rand References Chapter 4: Rejoinder to Doris Gordon on Abortion References Chapter 5: Response to Friedman on Narveson on Abortion References Chapter 6: Comment on Narveson on Friedman on Abortion References Part IV: Response to Non-libertarian Critics of Evictionism Chapter 7: Rejoinder to Boonin on Abortion References Chapter 8: A Response to Beckwith’s (1993) Book Review of Boonin (2003) References Chapter 9: Deadlocked; a Reaction to McDonagh and Ford on Abortion Part I. McDonagh Part II. Ford References Chapter 10: Response to Lee’s “A Christian Philosopher’s View of Recent Directions in the Abortion Debate” References Chapter 11: Marquis on Abortion I. Marquis (1989) References Chapter 12: Tooley on Abortion: A Rejoinder References Bibliography