Constitutional rights, moral controversy, and the Supreme Court
Book information
Description
In this important new book, Michael J. Perry examines three of the most disputed constitutional issues of our time: capital punishment, state laws banning abortion, and state policies denying the benefit of law to same-sex unions. The author, a leading constitutional scholar, explains that if a majority of the justices of the Supreme Court believes that a law violates the Constitution, it does not necessarily follow that the Court should rule that the law is unconstitutional. In cases in which it is argued that a law violates the Constitution, the Supreme Court must decide which of two importantly different questions it should address: (1) Is the challenged law unconstitutional? (2) Is the lawmakers' judgment that the challenged law is constitutional a reasonable judgment? (One can answer both questions in the affirmative.) By focusing on the death penalty, abortion, and same-sex unions, Perry provides illuminating new perspectives not only on moral controversies that implicate one or more constitutionally entrenched human rights, but also on the fundamental question of the Supreme Court's proper role in adjudicating such controversies.
Similar books
A Global Political Morality: Human Rights, Democracy, and Constitutionalism
2017 · PDF
Religion in Politics: Constitutional and Moral Perspectives
1997 · PDF
The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics?
1994 · PDF
We the People: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court
1999 · PDF
The Political Morality of Liberal Democracy
2009 · PDF
The Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries
1998 · PDF
Love and Power: The Role of Religion and Morality in American Politics
1993 · PDF
Toward a Theory of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts
2006 · PDF