ENGLISH

Tractatus de Signis: The Semiotic of John Poinsot

Book information

Publisher
St. Augustines Press
Year
2012
ISBN
1587318776, 9781587318771
Open Library ID
OL9411460M
Language
english
Format
DJVU
Filesize
15 MB (15883259 bytes)
Edition
First Edition - 1985
Pages
628\628
Orientation
no
Scanned
yes
Time added
2012-03-09 12:00:00

Description

This is a corrected second impression of the original bilingual critical edition of Poinsot’s work on signs completed in 1632 but not brought to independent publication until 1985 in the edition prepared by John Deely in collaboration with Ralph Austin Powell. Besides a new “Foreword” by the translator and an errata sheet, we have some new materials and a full table of correlations between the independent Tractatus edition and the original Cursus Philosophicus volumes from which that edition was established. This Cursus Philosophicus was one of the two great syntheses of Latin thought made in the lifetime of René Descartes. Yet only that of Francis Suarez in 1597, the Disputationes Metaphysicae, was destined to be read by the early moderns, while Poinsot’s Cursus Philosophicus was fated actually to fulfill the destiny Hume had feared his own work – falling “deadborn from the press.” The re-emergence in our day of Poinsot’s questions on signs shows, as Thomas A. Sebeok put it, that Poinsot “belongs decisively to that mainstream as the ’missing link’ between the ancients and the moderns in the history of semiotic, a pivot as well as a divide between two huge intellective landscapes” – the ancient and medieval one that stretches from Aristotle and the pre-Socratics to the time of Galileo and Descartes; and the modern landscape from that time to Einstein, Wittgenstein, and Husserl in our own “the ecology of neither of which could be fully appreciated without the other.” Poinsot’s standpoint provided the first systematic demonstration of how an understanding of the action of signs overcomes all the traditional splits between “nature” and “culture,” “mind-dependent” and “mindindependent” being, and in particular (the favorite modern divide) between “inner&rdqu

Similar books