Stare Indecisis: The Alteration of Precedent on the Supreme Court, 1946–1992
Book information
Description
Although the concept of precedent is basic to the operation of the legal system, there has not yet been a full-length empirical study of why U.S. Supreme Court justices have chosen to alter precedent. This book attempts to fill that gap by analyzing those decisions of the Vinson, Warren, and Burger courts, as well as the first six terms of the Rehnquist Court--a span of forty-seven years (1946-1992)--that formally altered precedent. The authors summarize previous studies of precedent and the Court, assess the conference voting of justices, and compile a list of overruling and overruled cases.
Similar books
Stare indecisis. Las alteraciones del precedente en la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos, 1946-1992
2017 · PDF
The Supreme Court Compendium: Two Centuries of Data, Decisions, and Developments
2021 · PDF
The Supreme Court Compendium: Two Centuries of Data, Decisions, and Developments
2021 · EPUB
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited
2002 · PDF
Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court
2001 · PDF
Strategy on the United States Supreme Court
2009 · PDF
Strategy on the United States Supreme Court
2009 · PDF
MySQL® Notes for Professionals book
2018 · PDF