CP 2: Elements of Logic

Description

ref:4.40, from "Why Study Logic?" ** ( *CP* 2:119–218, ref:4.1-104, 104¶¶), quoted on [Texas Tech Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism homepage](https://www.depts.ttu.edu/pragmaticism/):> 157\. […] science does not advance by revolutions, warfare, and cataclysms, but by coöperation, by each researcher’s taking advantage of his predecessors’ achievements, and by his joining his own work in one continuous piece to that already done.Peirce seems *contra* [Kuhn](https://isidore.co/calibre#panel=book_details&book_id=4451) and pro-continuity thesis of Duhem (cf. [Aristotelian Thomism](https://isidore.co/misc/Res%20pro%20Deo/scholastic/) thesis #6).* * **Minute Logic* : CP| **Title**| **Note** ---|---|--- 1.203–283| A Detailed Classification of the Sciences| Section 1, ch. 2 [“Pre-logical Notions”], of the “Minute Logic,” 1902. 1.575–584| Ultimate Goods| “Minute Logic,” ch. 4, 1902-3. 2.1–202| Critical Analysis of Logical Theories| “Intended Characters of this Treatise,” ch. 1 of the “Minute Logic” (1902). .79| Partial Synopsis of a Proposed Work in Logic| The remainder of ch. 1 of the “Minute Logic.” .119| Why Study Logic?| Second section of the second chapter, “Pre-logical Notions” of the “Minute Logic.” 4.227–323| The Simplest Mathematics| Chapter 3 of the “Minute Logic,” dated January-February, 1902. 6.349–352| Reality [essentia?] and Existence [ente?]| §§7 and 8 form a digression in ch. 4 of the Minute Logic (1902-3). 7.279| in: History of Science, § "3 Stages of Physical Research"| Section 1, “Classification of the Sciences,” of Minute Logic, Chapter 2, “Prelogical Notions” 7.374n10| Nomological Psychognosy| 7.362–387 except 381n19| Psychognosy| Section 1, “Classification of the Sciences,” of Minute Logic, Chapter 2, “Prelogical Notions”