Bayesians Versus Frequentists: A Philosophical Debate on Statistical Reasoning
Book information
Description
This book analyzes the origins of statistical thinking as well as its related philosophical questions, such as causality, determinism or chance. Bayesian and frequentist approaches are subjected to a historical, cognitive and epistemological analysis, making it possible to not only compare the two competing theories, but to also find a potential solution. The work pursues a naturalistic approach, proceeding from the existence of numerosity in natural environments to the existence of contemporary formulas and methodologies to heuristic pragmatism, a concept introduced in the book’s final section. This monograph will be of interest to philosophers and historians of science and students in related fields. Despite the mathematical nature of the topic, no statistical background is required, making the book a valuable read for anyone interested in the history of statistics and human cognition.
Similar books
Mathematical Encounters of the Second Kind
1996 · PDF
Mexican Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science
1996 · PDF
Euclid’s Heritage: Is Space Three-Dimensional?
1992 · PDF
The Mathematical Philosophy of Bertrand Russell: Origins and Development
1991 · PDF
Mathematical Intuitionism and Intersubjectivity: A Critical Exposition of Arguments for Intuitionism
1999 · PDF
MySQL® Notes for Professionals book
2018 · PDF
MrExcel 2022: Boosting Excel
2022 · PDF
MrExcel 2022: Boosting Excel
2022 · PDF