Climate Change Policy: A Survey
Book information
Description
I have the book, but you can do a search right now and attempt to find the word NUCLEAR in this older release. Dr. James Lovelock was right (see his REVENGE OF GAIA). Well-meaning researchers have a built-in and historic bias against nuclear energy as a policy/techology option to quell carbon emissions. And that bias has to be exposed for what it is: ignorance and/or inadequate risk assessment.
Can one of the authors of this book please give Amazon book reviewers a reasonable explanation for this? Especially for a book published only a few years ago? Did Island Press refuse to have a nuclear policy analyst included in the mix?
Similar books
Climate Change Policy: A Survey
2002 · PDF
Climate Change Policy: A Survey
2002 · PDF
The Genesis Strategy: Climate and Global Survival
1976 · DJVU
Wildlife Responses to Climate Change: North American Case Studies
2001 · PDF
The Primordial Bond: Exploring Connections between Man and Nature through the Humanities and Sciences
1981 · PDF
Food-Climate Interactions: Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Berlin (West), December 9–12, 1980
1981 · PDF
Preparing for Climate Change (Boston Review Books)
2010 · PDF
Scientists Debate Gaia: The Next Century
2004 · PDF