Right and Nature in the First and Second Scholasticism. Derecho y Naturaleza en la primera y segunda escolástica

Description

Authors of the ‘Second Scholasticism’ (as discussed in this volume, at least, mainly Iberian philosophers and theologians of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries) not only commented on the works and updated the teachings of medieval Scholastic masters, but also introduced many new ideas in all areas of philosophy, namely logic, natural philosophy, metaphysics, moral philosophy, political philosophy and the philosophy of law. In particular, issues arising from the “discovery” of the New World presented new challenges to these thinkers, provoking various reactions among them and causing them to develop new interpretations and theories, especially in practical philosophy and theology. In this volume, scholars from Europe, North America and South America identify and describe some of the main topics and central lines of thought in this still quite unknown chapter in the history of philosophical ideas. The contributors focus on the reception and development of Aristotelian-Thomistic and (to a lesser extent) Scotistic political theory, natural law, positive law and the law of nations in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries; some authors, moreover, address issues in the development of metaphysics during the same period. For the most part, the studies presented here concern the writings and thought of masters from the Universities of Salamanca, Alcalá, Évora and Coimbra, who responded to new questions and conceived new theories in political philosophy, law and moral philosophy closely related to the issues pertaining to the Spanish and Portuguese colonies in the New World. Front Matter ("Title Page", "Copyright Page", "Table of Contents", "Acknowledgements"), p. iii Free Access An Index of ‘Second Scholastic’ Authors, p. ix Roberto Hofmeister Pich https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103142 Natural Law as the Principle of Practical Reason: Thomas Aquinas’ Legacy in the Second Scholasticism, p. 1 Ludger Honnefelder https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103143 El anónimo Quaestio in utramque partem sobre la autonomía del poder real in temporalibus, p. 13 Pedro Roche Arnas https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103144 Legge naturale e fondazione dell’etica in Guglielmo di Ockham, p. 39 Alessandro Ghisalberti https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103145 El discurso de los saberes en la segunda escolástica, p. 55 José Luis Fuertes Herreros https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103146 Unjust Laws and Moral Obligation in Sixteenth-Century Salamancan Commentaries on Thomas Aquinas’ De legibus, p. 93 Marco Toste https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103147 Filosofía del derecho en sentido pragmático : Francisco de Vitoria y la escuela de Salamanca, p. 125 Ángel Poncela González https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103148 The Sixteenth-Century Debate on the Thomistic Notion of the Law of Nations in Some Iberian Commentaries on the Summa theologiae IIaIIae q.57 a.3: Contradiction or Paradigm Shift?, p. 157 Paula Oliveira e Silva https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103149 Natural Law and the Law of Nations: A Case Study, p. 187 António Martins https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103150 Sins Against Nature as Reasons For a ‘Just War’: Sepúlveda, Vitoria and Las Casas, p. 199 Giuseppe Tosi https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103151 Francisco de Vitoria and Luis de Molina on the Origin of Political Power, p. 231 Jörg Alejandro Tellkamp https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103152 Revisiting the Topic of the ‘Law of War’: The Comments on Thomas Aquinas’ Summa theologiae IIaIIae q.40 aa.1-4 by Fernando Perez (16th Century), p. 249 Roberto Hofmeister Pich https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103153 Tesis helenísticas en exégesis escolásticas: “Conformidad con la naturaleza” según Alberto Magno, Tomás de Aquino y Domingo de Soto, p. 271 Laura Corso de Estrada https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103154 La ley natural en Alfonso de Castro, OFM, p. 285 Manuel Lázaro Pulido https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103155 Mutability and Immutability of the ius gentium according to Suárez, p. 301 Alfredo Santiago Culleton https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103156 Francisco Suárez, crítico del monismo de Marsilio de Padua, p. 319 Francisco Bertelloni https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103157 Defensas históricas del poder político: F. Suárez y J. Locke teóricos de la moralidad por el acuerdo, p. 339 Giannina Burlando https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103158 Grotius and Scholasticism, p. 351 Luis Alberto De Boni https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103159 Molina in a Spanish Treatise against Machiavelli, p. 389 Alfredo Storck https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103160 El tratado De iure y sus migraciones sistemáticas en la escolástica (siglos XIII a XX), p. 403 Celina A. Lértora Mendoza https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103161 Filippo Fabri (1564-1630) on the Nature of Metaphysics: A Paduan Scotistic-Aristotelian Counter-Attack on Rival Doctrinal Traditions, p. 423 Marco Forlivesi https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103162 Trascendentales y categorías en la metafísica de Suárez, p. 449 Jorge J.E. Gracia, Daniel D. Novotný https://doi.org/10.1484/M.RPM-EB.5.103163 Back Matter ("Index of Manuscripts", "Index of Ancient and Medieval Names", "Index of ‘Second Scholastic’ Authors", "Index of Modern and Contemporary Authors"), p. 459 Free Access