Divergent paths: the academy and the judiciary
Book information
Description
Judges and legal scholars talk past one another, if they have any conversation at all. Academics criticize judicial decisions in theoretical terms, which leads many judges to dismiss academic discourse as divorced from reality. Richard Posner reflects on the causes and consequences of this widening gap and what can be done to close it.
Similar books
How Judges Think
2010 · PDF
Breaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution, and the Courts
2001 · PDF
The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy
2010 · PDF
The Federal Judiciary: Strengths and Weaknesses
2018 · PDF
Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary
2016 · PDF
The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory
2009 · PDF
The Federal Courts: Challenge and Reform, Revised Edition
2009 · PDF
Law and Literature: Third Edition
2009 · PDF