Empires: Elements of Cohesion and Signs of Decay

Description

The first issue of 'Medieval Worlds' (1/2015) has provided a broad overview of 'Approaches to Comparison' and of interdisciplinary projects being pursued in that context. This, the second issue, departs from a more focused thematic frame for comparison, the decay of empires. The comparison of empires has emerged as one of the most productive strands in today’s comparative and global history. Mayke de Jong reminds us in her contribution to the present issue that this is a relatively recent research interest. It emerged as a key topic in the 1990s, after the swift fall of the Soviet Empire and at the moment when the US seemed to reach unchallenged worldwide hegemony. The focus was both on modern and on ancient empires, especially on Rome and China. In medieval studies the topic was less prominent. That was not least because medieval European empires raised major problem of definition: when and to what degree were Byzantium and the Holy Roman Empire 'empires'? And which of the European steppe 'empires', those of the Huns, Avars, Bulgars, Magyars, Chasars or the Golden Horde, could confidently be defined as such? However, the fates of numerous Asian empires provide ample opportunities for wide-ranging comparison. Walter Pohl / Editor’s Introduction: Empires – Elements of Cohesion and Signs of Decay Mayke de Jong / The Empire that was always Decaying: The Carolingians (800-888) Simon MacLean / Cross-Channel Marriage and Royal Succession in the Age of Charles the Simple and Athelstan (c. 916-936) Andrew J. Newman / 'Great Men', 'Decline' and Empire: Safavid Studies and a Way Forward? Jeroen Duindam / Dynasties Susan Reynolds / Nations, Tribes, Peoples, and States Glenn Bowman / Lieux Saints Partagés: An Analytical Review Ongoing Research Project Johannes Preiser-Kapeller / Calculating the Middle Ages? The Project 'Complexities and Networks in the Medieval Mediterranean and Near East' (COMMED)